ArticleGigaScience2025
TinkerHap-a novel read-based phasing algorithm with integrated multimethod support for enhanced accuracy.
Article in GigaScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sequencing validates deep learning models for EHR-based detection of Noonan syndrome in pediatric patients.NPJ genomic medicine · 2025Article
- TinkerHap-a novel read-based phasing algorithm with integrated multimethod support for enhanced accuracy.GigaScience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPhasing, the assignment of alleles to their respective parental chromosomes, is fundamental to studying genetic variation and identifying disease-causing variants. Traditional approaches, including statistical, pedigree-based, and read-based phasing, face challenges such as limited accuracy for rare variants and reliance on external reference panels.
resultsTo address these limitations, we developed TinkerHap, a novel phasing algorithm that integrates a read-based phaser, based on a pairwise distance-based unsupervised classification, with external phased data, such as statistical or pedigree phasing. We evaluated TinkerHap's performance against other phasing algorithms using 1,040 parent-offspring trios from the UK Biobank (Illumina short reads) and GIAB Ashkenazi trio (PacBio long reads). TinkerHap's read-based phaser alone achieved higher phasing accuracies than all other algorithms with 95.1% for short reads (second best: 94.8%) and 97.5% for long reads (second best: 95.5%). Its hybrid approach further enhanced short-read performance to 96.3% accuracy and was able to phase 99.5% of all heterozygous sites. TinkerHap also extended haplotype block sizes to a median of 79,449 bp for long reads (second best: 68,303 bp) and demonstrated higher accuracy for both single-nucleotide polymorphisms and indels.
conclusionsThe combination of a robust read-based algorithm and a hybrid integration strategy makes TinkerHap a powerful and versatile tool for genomic analysis, enabling more accurate, contiguous, and comprehensive phasing across diverse sequencing platforms and variant types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.