Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41147634›Full record

ArticleRapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM2026

An Efficient Solid Phase Extraction Method for Purification and Analysis of Compound-Specific Plant Sugar Stable Hydrogen Isotope Values.

Selina Hugger, Meisha Holloway-Phillips, Ansgar Kahmen, Daniel B Nelson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Selina HuggerDepartment of Environmental Sciences - Botany, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0976-5573
Meisha Holloway-PhillipsDepartment of Environmental Sciences - Botany, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Ansgar KahmenDepartment of Environmental Sciences - Botany, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Daniel B NelsonDepartment of Environmental Sciences - Botany, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2716-7770

Funding

European Research Council 724750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThe stable hydrogen isotope composition (δ

methodsWe evaluated methods that use acetylation of soluble carbohydrate plant extracts to aid in purification as well as isotopic analysis of plant sugars such as sucrose. Extracts were obtained using either hot water or hot 80% ethanol. Acetylated extracts were then purified using an established liquid-liquid separation (LL) method or a new solid phase extraction (SPE) method that we developed. We also evaluated glucose produced from starch after enzymatic digestion. Method performance was evaluated based on quantified yields and the impact on measured δ

resultsAcetylated sucrose and starch-derived glucose were sufficiently resolved for gas chromatography in all cases. No isotopic biasing was detected for any method. Acetylated sucrose yields differed among methods, with 80% ethanol resulting in approximately threefold higher extraction yield compared to water, and SPE giving smaller but still sufficient yields compared to LL. Sample throughput was doubled with the SPE method compared to the LL method, which allows for larger batch sizes compared to LL.

conclusionsWe developed an efficient method to analyze compound-specific plant carbohydrate δ

Indexed as

DeuteriumPlant ExtractsPlantsSolid Phase ExtractionAcetylationGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryGlucoseStarchSucroseDeuteriumGlucosePlant ExtractsStarchSucrosecompound specific isotope analysisplant carbohydratespurificationsolid phase extractionstable hydrogen isotope

Identifiers

PMID41147634
PMCPMC12560618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.