ArticleJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2025
Household Food Insecurity and Feeding Practices in Brazilian Children < 5 Years: Results From Brazilian National Survey on Child Nutrition.
Article in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn 2023, food insecurity (FI) impacted households with children under 5 years old (< 5 y), where FI reached 37.5%. Establishing the link between feeding practices and FI in household surveys is essential to understanding children's dietary habits. However, this association has not yet been examined in Brazil using nationally representative data. This study aims to describe the prevalence of FI by sociodemographic variables and to estimate its association with feeding practices in Brazilian children < 5 y. METHODOLOGY: This study analysed data from the Brazilian National Survey on Child Nutrition (ENANI-2019), a household-based population evaluating 14,558 children < 5 y. FI was assessed using the Brazilian Food Insecurity Scale. Feeding practices were defined using national and international indicators/recommendations for each age group, using a structured questionnaire about food intake the day before the interview (< 6 months: early introduction of complementary feeding; 6-23 months: minimum dietary diversity (MDD), egg and/or flesh foods, and zero consumption of vegetables or fruits; 24-59 months: beans, vegetables, fruit, sweetened beverage and ultra-processed food consumption). Logistic regression was performed to estimate the association between FI and feeding practices, with p-values adjusted for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg method.
resultsFI was not associated with the early introduction of complementary feeding. Children aged 6-23 months experiencing severe FI had a 60% lower chance of meeting MDD (OR = 0.40 [95% CI: 0.21; 0.77]) and were 2.48 times more likely to consume zero vegetables or fruit (OR = 2.48 [95% CI: 1.31;4.69]) compared to those in food-secure households. Children aged 24-59 months living in severe FI had a 53% lower chance of consuming vegetables than their food-secure counterparts (OR = 0.47 [95% CI: 0.30;0.73]).
conclusionsWe found socioeconomic disparities across FI levels, with poorer feeding practices in food-insecure households, except among children under 6 months. Severe FI was associated to reduced fruit and vegetable intake and lower dietary diversity. Addressing FI requires policies that ensure food quantity and quality, prioritising low-income and underserved families. Future research should explore structural determinants and assess targeted interventions to improve child nutrition in the context of FI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.