Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41147304›Full record

ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2025

Implementation of a prospective in-clinic validated Feline Osteoarthritis Checklist.

Margaret Gober

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Pain and pain management in cats: an ever-evolving field.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Margaret GoberZoetis, NJ, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-5093-4415

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectivesThe goal of the present study was to screen two cat populations for osteoarthritis. There are an estimated 60 million cats in the USA, with a growing body of evidence identifying a high percentage of them as suffering from osteoarthritis (OA); however, many are undiagnosed. New tools, such as the Feline Osteoarthritis Checklist, are available for use in practice to help screen cats for OA.MethodsWorking with the same general small animal practice, one population of cats was retrospectively screened for OA using historical methods, including physical examination and owner engagement. These results were then numerically evaluated to a similar prospective population using the Feline OA Checklist as a screening tool. Five general practice veterinary clinics with feline patients participated in both parts of this study, providing a total of 502 cat medical records for the retrospective phase of this study and 437 completed screening forms in the prospective phase of this study.ResultsOf the cats in the retrospective phase of the study, 1% had orthopedic-related issues when methods of identification such as oral history and physical examination were used. When the Feline OA Checklist was used as a screening tool in a prospective population, 39% of cats were identified as demonstrating at least one behavior consistent with OA.Conclusions and relevancePain recognition is the first step of pain management, and the use of the Feline OA Checklist can help improve feline health and welfare by easily and readily identifying these patients. Utilizing tools such as the Feline OA Checklist to screen all cats in practice offers veterinary practitioners an efficient way to identify the impact of feline OA and begin alleviating pain-related suffering.

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesChecklistOsteoarthritisAnimalsCatsFemaleMaleProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesagingOA ChecklistosteoarthritisOsteoarthritispain

Identifiers

PMID41147304
PMCPMC12535645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.