Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41147090›Full record

ArticlePsychological medicine2025

A creative collaboration: the arts in psychiatric research.

Stefan Priebe, Paul Heritage

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stefan PriebeCentre for Psychosocial Medicine, https://ror.org/00g30e956University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9864-3394
Paul HeritageSchool of English and Drama, https://ror.org/026zzn846Queen Mary University of London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a rich history of using the arts in psychiatric care, e.g. in various forms of arts therapies. A more recent development is the collaboration of the arts in psychiatric research. The arts and psychiatric research have several fundamental differences which can lead to fruitful inspiration and innovative approaches in research. The benefits include a wider engagement of individuals and non-academic groups in research, creativity in designing research approaches, a reach to societal groups that academic research usually cannot access, and the provision of real life meaning to research evidence. Two examples of such collaborations illustrate the potentials.

Indexed as

ArtArt TherapyBiomedical ResearchCooperative BehaviorCreativityMental DisordersPsychiatryHumansArtscollaborationcreativitypsychiatryresearch

Identifiers

PMID41147090
PMCPMC13054898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.