Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41146977›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2025

Unveiling Psychological Capital Profiles and Their Impact on Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients: A Latent Profile Analysis.

Chunying Cui, Hairong Liu, Lie Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chunying CuiDepartment of Management, School of Humanities and Management, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0004-6342-0325
Hairong LiuDepartment of Management, School of Humanities and Management, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui, People's Republic of China.
Lie WangDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Our study aimed to identify the profiles of psychological capital (PsyCap), explore its influencing factors, and examine the association between PsyCap and quality of life (QoL) among breast cancer (BC) patients. Methods: A total of 229 BC patients completed our survey questionnaire. The questionnaire package included general sociodemographic and clinical information, the Psychological Capital Questionnaire for patients with Cancer (PCQ-C), and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B). Latent profile analysis was adopted to identify PsyCap profiles. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze each profile's sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and ANOVA was used to explore the relationships between PsyCap profiles and QoL. Results: Three profiles of PsyCap were identified, including the low PsyCap, moderate PsyCap, and high PsyCap groups, which comprised 23.1, 48.1, and 28.8% of the sample, respectively. Conclusion: PsyCap is classifiably heterogeneous among patients with BC, which suggests that healthcare professionals should give full consideration to the impact of unemployment on the PsyCap groups. The PsyCap profiles affected BC patients' QoL, so healthcare professionals can identify BC patients with poor QoL based on their PsyCap and provide them with psychological counseling services and psychological healing groups to help them improve their mental and physical health.

Indexed as

breast cancerlatent profile analysispsychological capitalquality of life

Identifiers

PMID41146977
PMCPMC12554275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.