ArticleJournal of surgical case reports2025
Giant retroperitoneal lipoma in 62-year-old male: a rare benign tumor in an unusual location.
Article in Journal of surgical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lipomas occur elsewhere in the body; however, retroperitoneal lipomas are extremely rare, benign tumors. Unlike liposarcoma, it lacks malignant potential but may grow to a large size because of its spacious retroperitoneal cavity. We report a 62-year-old male presented with progressive abdominal distension for over 2 months. Imaging revealed a large retroperitoneal fatty mass (15.5 × 12.3 × 22.8 cm) herniating through the obturator and sciatic foramina, displacing pelvic organs. Laparotomy with complete excision was performed, and histopathology confirmed a benign lipoma. The patient was discharged without adverse events. Retroperitoneal lipomas are rare and often indistinguishable from liposarcomas on imaging. Histopathology remains crucial for diagnosis, and complete surgical excision provides excellent prognosis, as demonstrated in this case. Differential diagnosis of retroperitoneal masses should include retroperitoneal lipomas, although they are rare. Imaging is useful; however, histopathological examination is essential for definitive diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.