ArticleSAGE open nursing
Correlates of Self-Care Agency Among Jordanian Patients With Type-1 Diabetes Mellitus.
Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To assess the level and determinants of self-care agency (SCA) among patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional design was used to collect data from 128 participants via an online survey. Participants were conveniently recruited from diabetes clinics in two major hospitals (one public, one teaching) in Jordan's largest cities. Data were collected using the Appraisal of Self-Care Agency Scale-Revised (ASAS-R), Diabetes Self-Efficacy Scale, and Diabetes Self-Management Scale. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVA, and Pearson correlation were used. Data collection occurred from October 2019 to January 2020. Results: Participants showed a relatively high level of SCA (74.1%, Conclusion: Participants had high SCA, especially in developing power, though lower scores were seen in "lacking power." Age, marital status, and comorbidities influenced this subscale. Higher SCA was associated with greater self-efficacy and self-management, underscoring its importance in diabetes care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.