ReviewSchizophrenia research. Cognition2026
Exploring the interplay between language use and cognitive function in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: Insights from patients, first degree relatives, and healthy controls.
Review in Schizophrenia research. Cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: For people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD), communication characterized by disrupted language use is common. However, the role of cognitive function in everyday language disruptions in SSD remains unclear. Family studies help control for confounding factors such as symptom burden, medication use and environment, offering insight into the interplay between language and cognition in SSD. Study design: We examined linguistic features in naturalistic speech from 176 individuals (51 with SSD, 77 first-degree relatives [50 parents, 27 siblings], and 48 healthy controls). Tasks included conversations, picture descriptions, story narration, reading and recall. We assessed cognitive domains: attention, verbal/visual memory, working memory, executive function, processing speed, motor dexterity, and theory of mind. We then studied associations between cognition and language. Results: Different patterns emerged across groups. In controls, longer speech and fewer pronouns were linked to better cognition. In SSD, greater adposition use and fewer pronouns related to better memory, executive function, and IQ. Among parents, more coordinating conjunctions during narration correlated with better visual memory and motor dexterity. Siblings showed the strongest, broadest associations: better cognition predicted richer language and fewer pronouns, especially tied to global and motor function. Story narration revealed the richest cognitive-linguistic links. Conclusions: In people with SSD and their relatives, specific cognitive deficits are reflected in everyday speech, regardless of content. These findings highlight the role of discourse context in shaping language-cognition relationships and support future research using language markers in psychosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.