ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2025
Utility of the L1 pelvic angle (L1PA) for assessment of sagittal alignment of the lumbar spine following short segment fusion: Comparison to segmental measures.
Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research progress on sagittal balance and minimal clinically important difference after two-level lumbar spondylolisthesis surgery.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The Lumbar Pelvic Angle (L1PA) was introduced as a convenient intraoperative and postoperative measure of sagittal alignment. However, the utility of L1PA for short segment lumbar fusions remains incompletely understood. This study investigates the relationship between L1PA and segmental parameters of spinal alignment for short segment lumbar fusions. Methods: This retrospective analysis was conducted on adult patients with degenerative conditions undergoing primary spinal fusion surgery between L4 and S1. Patients with <5° change in L1PA from pre- to postoperative measurements were stratified into 2 groups: those (1) achieving >35° of regional lordosis at L4-S1 postoperatively and (2) those with >5% change in Lumbar Distribution Index (LDI). Spinopelvic parameters were compared between preoperative and postoperative measurements. Results: The study cohort included 539 patients, of which 360 (66.8%) had an L1PA change less than <5° pre- to postoperatively. Patients in both Group 1 and 2 had significant increases in the L5-S1 segmental angle (both p<.001) without a significant change at the L4-L5 segment. In Group 2, there was a significant increase in PI-LL mismatch (p<.001). In both groups there was a significant increase in L4-S1 lordosis, a relaxation in L1-L4 lordosis (both p<.001), and no significant change in total LL. Conclusions: This investigation assessed L1PA in over 500 patients undergoing lumbar fusion between L4 and S1 and found that despite value to the measure, important changes to spinal shape and segmental alignment may occur even in the face of Δ L1PA <5°. As such, L1PA serves as a potentially useful adjunct to clinical assessment and radiographic measurement in lumbar degenerative fusion but should not serve as a stand-alone measurement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.