Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41146940›Full record

ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2025

Patient selection, clinical outcomes, associated healthcare utilization, and cost-effectiveness of basivertebral nerve ablation for the treatment of vertebrogenic low back pain: A narrative review.

Reza Ehsanian, Jordan A Buttner, Byron Schneider, Zachary L McCormick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Flow Cytometry Study of Immune Cell Subpopulations from the Mouse Vertebral Bone Marrow and Intervertebral Disc Following Endplate Microfracture.Biocell : official journal of the Sociedades Latinoamericanas de Microscopia Electronica ... et. al · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Reza EhsanianDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Jordan A ButtnerUniversity of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Byron SchneiderDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Zachary L McCormickDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic low back pain (cLBP) represents a significant burden to global health, with a prevalence projected to reach 843 million individuals by 2050. Vertebrogenic cLBP, a distinct phenotype, is mediated by nociception transmitted through the basivertebral nerve. Advances in basic and translational science have established clinical imaging biomarkers of vertebrogenic cLBP, such Type 1 and 2 Modic changes, to more reliably identify this condition. Additionally, medical technology advances have provided the ability to selectively disrupt pain signaling from painful vertebral endplates by interosseous basivertebral nerve ablation (BVNA). The objective of this review is to highlight appropriate patient selection, clinical outcomes, associated healthcare utilization, and cost-effectiveness of BVNA in the treatment of vertebrogenic cLBP. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were queried for articles published before September 2024. Two authors reviewed references for eligibility, extracted data, and appraised the quality of evidence. Results: Patient selection criteria include the presence of Type 1 or Type 2 Modic changes on MRI in the context of clinical suspicion of anterior element spinal pain based on clinical evaluation. BVNA was found to result in clinically significant and sustained pain relief and functional improvements in individuals with vertebrogenic cLBP. Randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews demonstrate long-term efficacy, with clinically meaningful benefits sustained up to 5 years postprocedure. Healthcare utilization analyses indicate that BVNA significantly reduces low back pain-related healthcare utilization, opioid use, and surgical intervention rates. Economic analysis indicates that BVNA is cost-effective when compared to conventional management of vertebrogenic cLBP. Conclusions: In appropriately selected patients, the overall body of evidence demonstrates that BVNA is an effective and durable treatment for vertebrogenic cLBP.

Indexed as

BasivertebralBasivertebral nerve ablationChronic painCost-effectiveness analysisIntervertebral disc degenerationLow back painPatient selectionTreatment outcomeVisual Analog ScaleZygapophyseal joint

Identifiers

PMID41146940
PMCPMC12554187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.