ArticleToxicology reports2025
Benzene exposure and health risk assessment among workers in informal footwear workshops: A cross-sectional study in Medan, Indonesia.
Article in Toxicology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Benzene is widely used in small-scale industries, particularly in informal footwear manufacturing, due to its adhesive properties. However, its volatility and carcinogenicity pose serious health risks to workers in poorly regulated environments. This study hypothesized that informal footwear workers in Medan are exposed to benzene concentrations exceeding international safety standards, resulting in measurable biological effects and increased health risks. Environmental monitoring was conducted in seven workshops, revealing ambient benzene levels ranging from 0.101 to 0.5147 mg/m³ . Five locations exceeded the NIOSH Recommended Exposure Limit (0.32 mg/m³), and all surpassed the WHO air quality guideline (0.005 mg/m³). Biomarker analysis showed elevated trans,trans-muconic acid (tt-MA) and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, particularly in workshops with poor ventilation and high worker density. A moderate correlation between tt-MA and MDA (r = 0.462, p = 0.003) confirmed the link between benzene exposure and oxidative stress. Clinical symptoms such as headache and appetite loss were significantly associated with MDA and tt-MA levels, respectively, suggesting early biological effects. Carcinogenic risk assessment indicated that four locations exceeded acceptable lifetime cancer risk thresholds, with Location VI presenting a 65-fold exceedance. These findings underscore the urgent need for low-cost interventions, such as improved ventilation and safer chemical substitutes, to reduce exposure in informal industrial settings. Longitudinal studies are recommended to clarify causal pathways and inform occupational health policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.