ArticleCureus2025
Evaluation of Suspected Achilles Tendon Rupture Managed Through Virtual Fracture Clinic Pathway in Busy Major Trauma Centre.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Achilles tendon rupture is one of the most common tendon injuries, affecting both males and females at a young age in athletic populations. These injuries can be best managed through the virtual fracture clinic once these patients present in the emergency department with suspected Achilles tendon ruptures. This study aims to evaluate the management of patients with Achilles tendon ruptures who are referred to virtual fracture clinics in the emergency department of a busy major trauma centre. Materials and methods This retrospective study reviewed all the patients referred from the emergency department to the virtual fracture clinic with suspected Achilles tendon ruptures. Data were collected through the electronic medical record system and by reviewing the patient's notes, which were analysed using SPSS Statistics version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Data were reviewed in terms of age, gender, side affected, ultrasound findings for full tear or partial tear of Achilles tendon, gastrocnemius tear, chronic tendinosis, and no tear of Achilles tendon. Data were reviewed in terms of management of the injury, whether conservative management or surgical management was adopted as a treatment option. Results A total of 170 patients were identified through the electronic records. In 10 patients, no ultrasound studies were performed, and three patients did not attend; therefore, they were excluded from the study according to our exclusion criteria. The patient's mean age in our study was 46.69 years. Out of 157 patients, 119 (75.8%) were male and 38 (24.2%) were female. The right side was involved in 89 (56.7%) of cases, and the left side was involved in 68 (43.3%). According to the ultrasound results, 94 patients (59.9%) had a complete tear of the Achilles tendon, 41 patients (26.1%) had a partial tear, two patients (1.3%) had chronic tendonitis, three patients (1.9%) had a gastrocnemius tear, and 17 patients (10.8%) showed no tears or problems. Conclusion The suspected Achilles tendon ruptures can be effectively managed through the virtual fracture clinic after referral from the emergency department. This decreases the chances of missing any injuries and is found to be safe, effective, and reproducible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.