Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41146822›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Sonographic Predictors and Outcomes of Second-Dose Misoprostol in Early Pregnancy Loss.

Nadine Ashkar Majadla, Lital Shiloach, Inshirah Sgayer, Ala Aiob, Lior Lowenstein, Marwan Odeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nadine Ashkar MajadlaRaya Strauss Wing Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya, ISR.
Lital ShiloachAzrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University, Safed, ISR.
Inshirah SgayerRaya Strauss Wing Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya, ISR.
Ala AiobRaya Strauss Wing Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya, ISR.
Lior LowensteinRaya Strauss Wing Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya, ISR.
Marwan OdehRaya Strauss Wing Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya, ISR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMisoprostol is a preferred medical agent for managing early pregnancy loss. However, the optimal protocol, particularly repeat dosing, remains a topic of debate.

objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of a second dose of misoprostol in women with incomplete uterine evacuation after the first dose, and to examine sonographic findings and demographic data to identify factors associated with successful treatment.

methodsRetrospective descriptive study of electronic medical records from a tertiary university-affiliated hospital. We identified women who had early pregnancy loss and received a second dose of misoprostol vaginally after an incomplete response to the first dose.

resultsA second dose of misoprostol achieved a 49% success rate for uterine evacuation without surgical intervention. Demographic and obstetric characteristics were similar in both the intervention and non-intervention groups; 44% of delayed miscarriages and 49% of anembryonic pregnancies with an intact sac persisted after the second dose (p<0.001). Delayed miscarriage and anembryonic pregnancy after the first dose significantly increased the odds of surgical intervention (delayed miscarriage: odds ratio (OR) 4.138, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.513-11.317; anembryonic pregnancy: OR 2.921, 95% CI 1.349-6.326).

conclusionA second dose of misoprostol offers effective care. Sonographic results after the first dose help forecast the need for surgical intervention.

Indexed as

anembryonic pregnancydelayed miscarriage.early pregnancy lossmisoprostol efficacymissed abortionsurgical intervention

Identifiers

PMID41146822
PMCPMC12553964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.