ArticleCureus2025
Implementation of a New Discharge Card in the Department of Internal Medicine at Atbara Teaching Hospital.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEffective discharge documentation is essential for safe transitions from hospital to community care. The Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA) outlines seven core data categories for patient discharge summaries. In low-resource settings, structured formats have been shown to improve completeness, clarity, and patient safety. This quality improvement project (QIP) aimed to develop and implement a standardized discharge card in the Internal Medicine Department of Atbara Teaching Hospital, Sudan, adapted from HIQA standards. METHODOLOGY: The project followed a two-cycle audit (April-August 2025). In the first cycle, 50 discharge records were reviewed to identify gaps. Records were randomly selected from the pool of available patient files, and auditing was conducted by three physicians not directly involved in patient care during the study period. A standardized discharge card was co-developed with staff, including essential demographic, clinical, and follow-up details. Training was provided, and the tool was implemented. In the second cycle, 40 discharge records were audited. Data was analyzed using chi-square tests to compare pre- and post-intervention documentation rates.
resultsSignificant improvements were observed in gender documentation (46.8%→100%,
conclusionThe standardized discharge card significantly improved documentation in key patient safety domains. Sustained gains require ongoing staff training and regular audits. This model may also be generalizable to other departments and hospitals in low-resource settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.