ReviewCureus2025
Lateral Meniscus Hypermobility: Current Concepts in Pathoanatomy, Diagnosis, and Evolving Treatment Strategies.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stable valley-like concavity at the midbody of the medial meniscus mimicking meniscocapsular separation: a case report.Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2026Article
- Static and dynamic ultrasound assessment of peripheral meniscal lesions: diagnostic value and clinical applications.Journal of ultrasonography · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypermobility of the lateral meniscus (HLM) is an under-recognised yet clinically important source of knee pain and mechanical symptoms. It differs from conventional meniscal tears in that the meniscus itself remains structurally intact, while insufficiency of stabilising structures such as the popliteomeniscal fascicles, posterior capsule, and meniscotibial ligament permits abnormal translation. The distinctive anatomy of the lateral meniscus explains its greater vulnerability to instability compared with the medial side, particularly in young and athletic individuals. Patients commonly report episodic locking, catching, or giving way, but imaging findings are often inconspicuous, making arthroscopy the diagnostic gold standard. Dynamic arthroscopic manoeuvres, including probing, aspiration, and the figure-of-four test, reliably demonstrate pathological translation. Conservative measures may provide transient relief but are rarely curative, as the pathology reflects structural instability rather than degenerative change. Contemporary surgical management emphasises meniscal preservation through repair and reinforcement of meniscocapsular attachments, using techniques such as inside-out or all-inside sutures, fascicular plication, or capsulodesis. In cases of fascicular deficiency, reconstruction with grafts or anchors has been described, while anterior horn hypermobility, though less common, can be effectively treated with outside-in fixation. Meniscectomy, once widely performed, is now reserved for irreparable cases given its strong association with lateral compartment degeneration. Reported outcomes following meniscus-preserving repair are consistently favourable, with high rates of symptom resolution, return to sport, and joint preservation. Therefore, HLM should be regarded as a pathology of dynamic instability that requires careful diagnostic evaluation and a surgical approach focused on stabilisation rather than resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.