Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41146801›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Pituitary and Optic Tract Lesions Masquerading As Glaucoma: Highlighting Diagnostic Challenges.

Priti Singh, Samendra Karkhur, Vidhya Verma, Saroj Gupta, Rama Tulasi Siri Duddumpudi, Radhika Agarwal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Priti SinghOphthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, IND.
Samendra KarkhurOphthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, IND.
Vidhya VermaOphthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, IND.
Saroj GuptaOphthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, IND.
Rama Tulasi Siri DuddumpudiOphthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, IND.
Radhika AgarwalOphthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose This study's purpose is to highlight the diagnostic pitfalls in distinguishing glaucomatous optic neuropathy from compressive optic neuropathies caused by intracranial lesions, particularly pituitary macroadenomas. Methodology This research was a retrospective case series of six patients who were originally diagnosed or suspected to have glaucomatous optic neuropathy but later revealed intracranial lesions on neuroimaging. Results All patients had optic disc cupping and/or pallor with visual field defects (VFDs) overlapping with glaucomatous patterns. However, atypical features such as VFDs respecting the vertical meridian, homonymous hemianopia, optic disc pallor disproportionate to cupping, and poor correlation between structure and function raised suspicion for non-glaucomatous causes. Neuroimaging revealed pituitary macroadenoma in four patients, parasellar meningioma in one, and an optic tract lesion in another. Conclusion Compressive optic neuropathies may closely mimic glaucoma, resulting in delayed diagnosis and inappropriate treatment. Careful attention to atypical field patterns and disc findings, combined with timely neuroimaging, is crucial for avoiding irreversible vision loss.

Indexed as

compressive optic neuropathyoptical coherence tomography (oct)optic tract lesionpituitary macroadenomavisual field defects

Identifiers

PMID41146801
PMCPMC12554342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.