ArticleCureus2025
Successful Autotransplantation of a Mandibular Third Molar to Replace a Non-restorable Mandibular First Molar: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This case report describes the successful autotransplantation of a mandibular left third molar (tooth 38) to replace a non-restorable mandibular left first molar (tooth 36) in a 38-year-old female patient who presented with severe pain due to extensive caries and periapical pathology. Preoperative intraoral periapical radiographs via radiovisiography (RVG) confirmed the suitability of tooth 38 as a donor owing to its vitality and compatible root morphology. The procedure involved atraumatic extraction of tooth 36, precise socket preparation using a 3D-printed replica, and immediate transplantation of tooth 38 under local anesthesia. A non-rigid splint stabilized the autotransplanted tooth, and elective root canal treatment was performed at two weeks to prevent pulp necrosis. Follow-up at one, three, six, and 12 months revealed clinical stability, normal occlusion, and radiographic evidence of periodontal ligament healing, without resorption or ankylosis. The patient reported restored function and satisfaction. This case highlights autotransplantation as a viable and cost-effective alternative to implants, preserving natural dentition in adults with mature donor teeth, and underscores the importance of digital planning for optimal outcomes. A long-term follow-up is recommended to ensure sustained success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.