Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41146745›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of lifestyle medicine2025

Healthcare Professionals' Perceptions of Lifestyle Medicine in Specialized Care: A Survey-Based Study in a Dutch Hospital.

Catalina Paz Figueroa, Paula Bühring, W M Monique Verschuren, Marilyne Menassa, Oscar H Franco, Lonneke van Leeuwen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of lifestyle medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Catalina Paz FigueroaDepartment of Global Public Health & Bioethics, Julius Center for Health Science and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4424-021X
Paula BühringDepartment of Global Public Health & Bioethics, Julius Center for Health Science and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
W M Monique VerschurenDepartment of Global Public Health & Bioethics, Julius Center for Health Science and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Marilyne MenassaDepartment of Global Public Health & Bioethics, Julius Center for Health Science and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3277-4313
Oscar H FrancoDepartment of Global Public Health & Bioethics, Julius Center for Health Science and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Lonneke van LeeuwenDepartment of Global Public Health & Bioethics, Julius Center for Health Science and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6625-632X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lifestyle Medicine (LM) offers promise for managing chronic diseases, yet its implementation in healthcare remains limited. Successful implementation requires understanding healthcare professionals' (HCPs) perceptions, given their roles in advising patients and referring to lifestyle interventions. This study explores how HCPs at a Dutch academic hospital perceive LM. We conducted an anonymous online survey of physicians, nurses, and other HCPs in adult specialized care. We assessed perceptions of LM, how these varied across professional roles, and barriers and facilitators to implementation. We thematically analyzed free-text responses to identify factors influencing perceptions of lifestyle medicine. Of 303 participants, 14% were familiar with LM and 19% reported never discussing lifestyle with patients. However, 92% supported prioritizing lifestyle changes in healthcare and 69% prioritized implementing lifestyle programs in their hospital. 71% felt confident initiating lifestyle conversations, and 45% in promoting behavior change. Main barriers to discussing lifestyle included limited time (43%) and unclear referral pathways (38%). Thematic analysis generally revealed a positive perception of LM, but some questioned its suitability in specialized care. Most HCPs support LM, but LM's role in specialized care requires clearer analysis and articulation. Greater awareness, practical support, and training seem key for successful implementation.

Indexed as

healthcare professionalsimplementationlifestyle medicineperceptionsspecialized care

Identifiers

PMID41146745
PMCPMC12553549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.