Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41146672›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2025

Psychotropic medication consumption before and after onset of COVID-19 pandemic in 91 countries and regions: a time-series analysis.

Caige Huang, Yu Yang, Yue Wei, Vincent K C Yan, Kyung Jin Lee, Shek Ming Leung, Francisco T T Lai, Yi Chai, Ruth Brauer, David J Castle and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Psychotropic drugs in drinking water? A scoping review of evidence on diazepam and fluoxetine.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Caige HuangCentre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yu YangCentre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yue WeiCentre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Vincent K C YanCentre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Kyung Jin LeeCentre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Shek Ming LeungCentre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Francisco T T LaiCentre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yi ChaiCentre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Ruth BrauerResearch Department of Practice and Policy, UCL School of Pharmacy, London, UK.
David J CastleCentre for Mental Health Service Innovation, Statewide Mental Health Service, TAS, Australia.
Li WeiLaboratory of Data Discovery for Health (D24H), Hong Kong Science Park, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Joseph F HayesDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Hao LuoSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Dan SiskindMedical School, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Eric W C YanKowloon Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Esther W Y ChanCentre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The availability of psychotropic medications serves as a key indicator of global mental health status, underscoring the critical importance of continued monitoring. However, comprehensive studies assessing the global effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on such trends remain lacking. This study aimed to describe psychotropic consumption trends before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and investigate the pandemic's short- and long-term effects on psychotropic consumption across 91 countries and regions. Methods: This study used country-level sales data of psychotropic medications between Q1, 2012, and Q2, 2023 of 91 countries and regions from the IQVIA-Multinational Integrated Data Analysis System. Average annual sales trends were estimated and expressed as defined daily dose per 1000 inhabitants per day (DDD/TID) at the overall level and stratified by medication class and country income level. Relative average annual changes were assessed for the periods 2017-2019 and 2020-2022 both overall and within specific medication classes and income groups. The pandemic's short- and long-term effects on psychotropic medication sales were examined through interrupted time series analyses using quarterly data, conducted for each country and at overall level. Findings: Globally, the total consumption of psychotropic medications increased from 34.12 DDD/TID in 2020 to 36.15 DDD/TID in 2022, corresponding to a relative average increase of 2.94% [95% CI 0.97, 4.94] annually. The estimated relative change during 2020-2022 were 1.82% [1.02, 2.64] in Lower-Middle-Income-Countries (LMICs), 6.77% [-0.39, 14.45] in Upper-Middle-Income-Countries (UMICs), and 2.48% [0.72, 4.27] in High-Income-Countries (HICs). Overall psychotropic consumption showed an initial surge in Q1 2020 (level change: 1.94 DDD/TID [1.67, 2.21]), followed by a rapid decline during Q2 2020 (level change: -1.03 [-1.52, -0.54]). Most HICs exhibited a similar pattern. Following the pandemic onset, there was an increasing trend in overall psychotropic consumption (trend change: 0.13 [0.07, 0.19]). 70 of 91 countries showed an increasing slope change. Interpretation: Psychotropic medication consumption increased globally after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. During the pandemic, consumption rates in LMICs and UMICs appeared to slow down, however, patterns of change in psychotropic medication consumption following onset of the pandemic vary on a country level. To address these disparities, strategies for equitable psychotropic medication distribution and enhanced mental health care access in LMICs and UMICs are needed to improve global mental health. Funding: None.

Indexed as

Global mental healthPsychotropic medicationsTime-series analysis

Identifiers

PMID41146672
PMCPMC12554202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.