ArticleMaterials today. Bio2025
Acetylated chitosan scaffolds modulate the micro-environment and promote peripheral nerve regeneration through macrophage TLR2/4 pathway activation.
Article in Materials today. Bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-assisted design of self-assembling peptide hydrogels for neural regeneration: Principles and opportunities.Bioactive materials · 2027Review
- Harnessing neutrophils for tissue repair and regeneration: mechanisms, biomaterial engineering strategies and translational potential.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current nerve repair materials have limited capacity to actively regulate the regenerative micro-environment, lack effective intervention strategies and clarity mechanisms, resulting in insufficient tissue repair and regeneration capabilities. Acetylated chitosan (ACS) with high degree of acetylation (DA) exhibits rapid degradation properties and induces severe local inflammatory responses when subcutaneously implanted as a tissue engineering scaffold material. To balance the bio-compatibility and biodegradability of ACS, we systematically investigated the role of the DA in modulating inflammatory responses and tissue regeneration. Results showed that for ACS scaffolds with DA ≥ 50 %, the intensity of the inflammatory response increased proportionally with the DA. In a rat sciatic nerve crush repair model, ACS scaffolds with DA values of 50 % and 70 % induced moderate inflammation that was favorable for nerve regeneration. However, scaffolds with DA values of 90 % triggered excessive inflammation, impairing effective nerve repair. Mechanistically, we discovered that acetyl groups, acting as lipid a mimetics, can activate Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4). TLR4 interacts with Adenylyl cyclase-associated protein 1 (CAP1), to drive macrophage polarization and release inflammatory factors proportional to the DA. Additionally, ACS activated macrophages release large amounts of Chitotriosidase-1 (CHIT1), which degrades ACS scaffolds into smaller fragments recognized by TLR2, further amplifying inflammatory signals via classical pathways. This dual regulatory mechanism mediated by ACS-TLR4-CAP1 and ACS-CHIT1-TLR2 provides new insights into the immune activation induced by ACS scaffolds. These findings identify potential therapeutic targets and offer guidance for optimizing ACS scaffold design to improve tissue regeneration outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.