ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2025
Assessing the in vivo Safety of Dendrimer-Based Formulations Used in Photodynamic Therapy.
Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in Nanomedicine-Enhanced Photodynamic Therapy in Cutaneous Oncology: Melanoma-Dominant Evidence for Immunogenic Cell Death and Photoimmunotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a promising cancer treatment. However, the efficacy of photosensitizers such as rose bengal (RB) is often limited by poor delivery. Dendrimer-based nanocarriers can enhance PDT efficacy in vitro, but their in vivo safety profile remains largely uncharacterized. This study aimed to assess the systemic safety of three different dendrimer-based RB delivery systems in a healthy mouse model. Methods: BALB/c mice were randomly divided into eight groups and received weekly intraperitoneal injections of either PBS (control), free RB, or one of three carriers (phosphorus dendrimer 1cat, dendrimersome DG2, PPI G3 dendrimer) with or without RB. Body weight was monitored weekly. Blood and urine samples were collected over four weeks for comprehensive biochemical and microscopic analysis, assessing markers for liver, kidney, and muscle function. Results: No significant changes in body weight were observed across any of the groups. Analysis of blood biochemical parameters (including ALT, AST, urea, creatinine, and LDH) and urine profiles revealed no statistically significant differences between any treatment group and the PBS control group over the four-week study period. The observed minor fluctuations in some parameters were not dose- or time-dependent and remained within normal physiological ranges. Conclusion: The three tested nanocarrier systems - phosphorus dendrimer 1cat, dendrimersome DG2, and PPI G3 dendrimer - and their respective rose bengal formulations are well tolerated and do not induce systemic toxicity in BALB/c mice at the tested concentrations. These findings support their safety for in vivo applications and provide a basis for future efficacy studies in tumor-bearing animal models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.