ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2025
Nanodelivery Strategies for STING Agonists: Toward Efficient Cancer Immunotherapy.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Illumination of Targeting Nanotherapeutics with Precision Eyes: From Optical to Radio-nanotheranostics.Theranostics · 2026Review
- The Nanoparticle Delivery Gap in Immune Cell Engineering: From Uptake to Endosomal Escape.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
cGAS-STING (cyclic GMP-AMP synthetase-interferon gene stimulator) signaling pathway has great potential in tumor treatment, and its superior performance in tumor treatment makes it a new method for tumor treatment. However, the delivery of STING agonists alone has some limitations, such as easy degradation and low bioavailability. Moreover, STING agonists are usually injected intratumorally to avoid systemic side effects caused by strong immune responses, which is not suitable for metastatic lesions. Using nanocarriers to deliver STING agonists can overcome these limitations to some extent. This review explores the collaborative foundation between nanodelivery systems and the STING signaling pathway. It systematically summarizes the existing types of STING agonists and the types of nanoscale delivery systems and analyzes the delivery strategies of STING agonist delivery systems from multiple aspects, including the tumor microenvironment (TME), tumor cell targeting, multifunctional integrated drug delivery systems, and novel biomaterial. The review elaborates on the practical applications of these strategies as well as the challenges and problems they face. Finally, it analyzes and discusses the potential future directions of STING nanodelivery systems, aiming to provide references for research in related fields and to promote the efficient application of STING agonists in cancer therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.