Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41146641›Full record

ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research

AI performance in oral cytology for differentiating poorly defined tumor cells from reactive atypia.

Kaori Oya, Kazuma Kokomoto, Mami Okamoto, Yuko Kondo, Sunao Sato, Kazunori Nozaki, Mitsunobu Kishino, Satoru Toyosawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kaori OyaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The University of Osaka Dental Hospital, 1-8 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuma KokomotoDepartment of Medical Informatics, The University of Osaka Dental Hospital, 1-8 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Mami OkamotoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The University of Osaka Dental Hospital, 1-8 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Yuko KondoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The University of Osaka Dental Hospital, 1-8 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Sunao SatoDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Graduate School of Dentistry, The University of Osaka, 1-8 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Kazunori NozakiDepartment of Medical Informatics, The University of Osaka Dental Hospital, 1-8 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Mitsunobu KishinoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The University of Osaka Dental Hospital, 1-8 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Satoru ToyosawaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The University of Osaka Dental Hospital, 1-8 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite its investigative potential, few studies have reported the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in oral cytology. Oral mucosal cells display significant cellular atypia due to inflammatory stimulation or denaturation, whereas well-differentiated oral squamous cell carcinomas do not always show remarkable cellular atypia. The presence of noncancerous atypical cells alongside ill-defined tumor cells poses significant challenges to the development of effective AI tools. Thus, we aimed to investigate the effect of these atypical cells on AI performance. Materials and methods: We used 29 cases of non-neoplastic lesions, including gingivitis, stomatitis, and 17 squamous cell carcinomas for supervised learning and validation. The cells were classified into four categories: normal, cancer, orange-suspicious, and green-suspicious. Orange and green suspicious cells indicated tumor cells lacking definitive morphological features. Annotation was performed using VoTT v2.2.0, and YOLOv7 as the object detection model, with model training being performed in six ways. Results: The model that learned orange- and green-suspicious cells as cancer exhibited the highest detection capabilities, but also yielded a high number of false positives. In contrast, the model that excluded information about suspicious cells could rightfully identify some suspicious cells as cancer with fewer false positives. Conclusions: Discriminating ill-defined tumor cells from atypical non-neoplastic cells based solely on morphology is challenging. Classifying suspicious cells as cancer often results in numerous false positives. Conversely, AI trained on normal and cancer can reveal previously unnoticed cancerous features in suspicious cells.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceCell classificationCytodiagnosisObject detectionOral cytologySquamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID41146641
PMCPMC12554175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.