ArticlePsychophysiology2025
Look Fear in the Eyes: The Influence of Emotion Regulation on Spider Size Estimation-A Pupillometry Study.
Article in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The link between perceptual biases and fear has been extensively documented in recent years. For example, the size of spiders is overestimated among people with a high fear of them. While emotion regulation processes are known to reduce fear, it is yet unknown whether emotion regulation can also reduce fear-related perceptual biases. This study examined the behavioral and physiological influence of cognitive reappraisal, an adaptive emotion regulation strategy, on spider size estimation among women with a high fear of spiders. Forty women with a high fear of spiders completed a trial-by-trial task with three conditions: (1) reappraising a negative image (reappraise-negative), (2) passively viewing a negative image (watch-negative), and (3) passively viewing a neutral image (watch-neutral). Following each condition, participants estimated the size of either a spider or a butterfly depicted in a picture. Pupil size was tracked to assess arousal and regulation-related processes. Results showed that reappraisal was associated with greater pupil dilation, reflecting heightened cognitive effort. Following reappraisal, participants reported the animals as smaller. Pupil size during the reappraisal assignment did not mediate the effect of condition on size ratings, suggesting that cognitive effort during the regulation did not predict the perceptual bias. Together, the findings suggest that instructed reappraisal can reduce perceptual biases associated with fearful stimuli, and that pupil dilation can serve as a physiological marker of emotion regulation. We discuss the implications of the findings for the understanding of the links between emotion regulation and perceptual biases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.