ArticleJournal of dental education2026
Exploring an LLM's Use in Supporting Journal Club Preparation and Discussion Among Residents.
Article in Journal of dental education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionJournal clubs (JCs) play an important role in medical education by promoting critical appraisal and evidence-based practice. However, residents often face barriers to effective participation. Some of the issues that are commonly faced include limited time and difficulty understanding complex concepts and statistics.
methodsThis study was conducted during March-September 2024 and explored the use of a custom-trained Large Language Model (LLM) as a supportive tool for JC preparation and participation among postgraduate dental residents. Using a design-based research approach, researchers implemented the LLM integrated with relevant literature. Six JC sessions were conducted with sixteen residents across two subspecialties, accompanied by structured observations, feedback forms, and pre-/and post-focus groups with residents and faculty (n = 16).
resultsFindings revealed that the LLM improved residents' comprehension of complex content, enhanced confidence, and increased engagement during discussions. Residents used the tool for summarizing articles, clarifying statistical methods, and generating discussion points. Fiftythree percent reported a positive experience of using the LLM for JC preparation, Forty-three percent were neutral, and only one response was negative. However, challenges included the need for precise prompt construction, occasional content inaccuracies, and limited depth in some specialized areas. Faculty observed enhanced participation but stressed the need for critical evaluation of LLM outputs. Both groups identified prompt-writing skills, critical thinking, and AI literacy as key competencies for effective LLM use.
conclusionsLLMs can complement traditional teaching by supporting deeper engagement in JCs. As generative AI evolves, further research should examine its broader implications on learners' cognitive processes, epistemic trust, and educational equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.