ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2026
Intraspecific variation in prey quality affects the consumption rates of top predators.
Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intraspecific variation in prey quality affects the consumption rates of top predators.The Journal of animal ecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prey quality, measured as energy density and energy content, is a key functional trait in predator-prey relationships. While the effects of interspecific differences in prey quality on predators have been examined previously, the consequences of intraspecific variation remain less understood. To examine how within-species variation in prey quality influences predator foraging, we modelled the effects of prey size, maturity and sampling season and region on the quality of Engraulis mordax, Sardinops sagax and Doryteuthis opalescens-three common prey species for top predators in the California Current Ecosystem (CCE). We contextualized our findings using documented energy budgets of the California sea lion (Zalophus californianus), a consumer of these species and an important ecosystem indicator in the CCE. We found significant within-species variation in prey quality related to size, maturity, season and region, with stronger effects in fish than squid. These patterns likely reflect prey life history and regional and seasonal oceanographic conditions that influence energy storage. Under static prey availability and predator energy demands, daily biomass requirements driven by intraspecific variation in prey quality were comparable to previous estimates based on interspecific differences. By integrating predator bioenergetics with prey energy content models, we found that the number of prey required can vary by tens of thousands depending on prey size-rendering smaller individuals an impractical energy source for non-filter-feeding predators. Even accounting for size, predators may need to consume up to twice as many individuals when foraging on lower-quality prey from certain regions, seasons or maturity stages compared to higher-quality conspecifics. Our findings highlight the critical importance of incorporating intraspecific variation in prey quality into bioenergetics frameworks that inform predator foraging predictions. As climate change and resource exploitation intensify, integrating functional traits and energetic trade-offs into predator-prey studies will be essential for anticipating predator responses and evaluating ecosystem resilience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.