Critical appraisal of progress and challenges in tuberculosis preventive treatment in the Western Pacific Region: a situational analysis of seven high tuberculosis burden countries.

We commend Oh et al.'s recent analysis of TB preventive treatment (TPT) in the Western Pacific Region, but note important gaps and ways forward. We first caution that reliance on routine program data may overestimate gains. For example, China's passive surveillance misses ≈20% of cases [1]. Prospective cohorts or integrated surveillance including clinical databases could validate coverage estimates. We also urge attention to overlooked risk groups beyond children and PLHIV (as highlighted by Oh et al. [2]), groups like healthcare workers, prisoners, and people with diabetes warrant targeted TPT pilots (e.g., occupational health or prison-based programs). In the Philippines, ~ 36% of TB patients first seek private care [3], so partnering with private clinics and pharmacies is essential to reach all contacts. Likewise, MDR-TB contacts were underemphasized; WHO now strongly recommends a 6-month levofloxacin regimen for MDR contacts [4]. We encourage pilot studies of this regimen (as in Mongolia [5]) and operational research on MDR-TPT. Finally, policy does not guarantee practice as Cambodia and Lao PDR have guidelines, yet stockouts and training gaps persist [6, 7]. Embedding TPT in universal health insurance and conducting cost effectiveness studies will support sustainable scale-up. In sum, by suggesting concrete examples and research strategies for each country, we aim to refine Oh et al.'s insights into actionable steps for TPT acceleration.