ArticleJournal of eating disorders2025
Broad considerations for improving eating disorder care: a lived experience and quality improvement perspective.
Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Operationalising adult eating disorders admission criteria in Australian emergency departments: a clinical decision-support approach.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- The importance of learning from people with lived experiences of eating disorders.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Improvements to eating disorder (ED) care are urgently needed in the United Kingdom (UK) and internationally. This solution-focused article suggests ways to improve individuals’ access to and experiences of ED care. It is the second paper in a two-part series that has been informed by my lived experiences of having a longstanding ED, voluntary involvement in quality improvement for the National Health Service (NHS), and international research. In the preceding article, titled “Improving eating disorder care for underserved groups: a lived experience and quality improvement perspective” (Asaria in J Eat Disord 13(1):11, 2025), I identified 12 groups of individuals with lived experiences whom I believe are more likely to be underserved in ED care. In the present paper, broader problems experienced by ED sufferers and ED caregivers/loved ones as a whole are considered, as they are generally an underserved group in mental health care. These broad problems relate to 10 overlapping domains of ED care that I have identified as being in need of improvement – they are referred to as ‘broad considerations’ (BCs). Each BC has a dedicated section that may be read independently for readers’ convenience. The BCs are as follows: [BC. 1] Awareness, stigma, and prevention; [BC. 2] Research and lived experience involvement; [BC. 3] Clinical monitoring; [BC. 4] Diagnosing, formulating, and care planning; [BC. 5] Rapid/early interventions; [BC. 6] Treatments (excluding rapid/early interventions); [BC. 7] Service transitions and community care; [BC. 8] Clinical education/training; [BC. 9] Systemic considerations; [BC. 10] Funding and resources. In addition to discussing these BCs, I advocate a humanistic care model based on the inexpensive principles of Compassion, Hope, Empathy, Appreciation (of identity), and Patience (CHEAP). I suggest that even under-resourced healthcare providers can afford to provide CHEAP care if they care enough and try hard enough.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.