ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2025
Infection risk of peripheral intravenous catheters: meta-synthesis of 18 prospective studies with 14,606 catheters.
Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An international randomised controlled trial of a novel antimicrobial dressing for peripheral intravenous catheters (ProP trial).Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo quantify the incidence of peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) infections and to describe the influence of clinical characteristics, including dwell time, on risk.
methodsMeta-synthesis of 18 prospective studies (16 randomized controlled trials and two prospective cohort studies) reporting PIVC infections. In total, 14,606 PIVCs (50,096 device-days) were studied from insertion to removal in seven Australian government hospitals. PIVC care was provided by clinical staff with daily follow up by research nurses. We calculated incidences and rates of local infection (without bloodstream infection [BSI]) and PIVC-associated bloodstream infection (i.e., primary BSI) using the National Healthcare Safety Network criteria. The hazard function was assessed by fitting a parametric survival model. PIVC-associated BSI was further categorized as PIVC-related BSI and/or Staphylococcus aureus BSI. Case study methodology explored characteristics of PIVC-associated BSI, and life tables explored the hazard function of PIVC-associated BSI over dwell time.
resultsOf 14,606 PIVCs (dwell 0-42 days), there were five local infections (0.034%; 0.100/1,000 device-days) and six PIVC-associated BSI (0.041%; 0.120/1,000 device-days), of which four were PIVC-related and one was S. aureus BSI. PIVC-associated BSI involved Enterobacter cloacae (n = 3 including one co-infection with Citrobacter braakii), Proteus mirabilis (n = 1), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 1) and S. aureus (n = 1; S. aureus BSI incidence 0.007% catheters or 0.020/1000 device-days). PIVC-associated BSI cases commonly featured: males > 60 years with difficult intravenous access, delayed removal of idle or symptomatic PIVCs, cancer diagnoses, invasive gastrointestinal drains/procedures, insertion site complications, and forearm placement. PIVC-associated BSI daily hazard was constant over time with zero to 0.03% on Days 1 to 5 (n = 11,491), 0.06% to 0.10% on Days 6 and 7 (n = 2,571), and zero on Days 8 to 42 (n = 544).
conclusionsInfection incidence is very low but remains a serious risk, mainly for complex patients. Gram-negative organisms may now be predominant in Australia. Infection surveillance should be risk-adjusted and prevention efforts to improve both insertion and post-insertion management targeted at high-risk groups. While overall intravenous therapy (exposure) should be minimised, daily risk per PIVC appears constant for at least 5 days.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.