Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41146294›Full record

ArticleStem cell research & therapy2025

Spatial self-organization of cancer stem cell niches revealed by live single-cell imaging.

Mathilde Brulé, Anais Horochowska, Emeline Fontaine, Raoul Torero-Ibad, Flavie Woesteland, Marie Denoulet, Jean Pesez, Eric Adriaenssens, Robert-Alain Toillon, Xuefen Le Bourhis and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mathilde Brulé *Univ. Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Centre Oscar Lambret, UMR9020-UMR-S 1277-Canther-Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, Université de Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
Anais Horochowska *Univ. Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Centre Oscar Lambret, UMR9020-UMR-S 1277-Canther-Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, Université de Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
Emeline FontaineUniv. Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Centre Oscar Lambret, UMR9020-UMR-S 1277-Canther-Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, Université de Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
Raoul Torero-IbadUniv. Lille, CNRS, UMR 8523-PhLAM-Physique des Lasers Atomes et Molécules, Université de Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
Flavie WoestelandUniv. Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Centre Oscar Lambret, UMR9020-UMR-S 1277-Canther-Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, Université de Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
Marie DenouletUniv. Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Centre Oscar Lambret, UMR9020-UMR-S 1277-Canther-Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, Université de Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
Jean PesezUniv. Lille, CNRS, UMR 8523-PhLAM-Physique des Lasers Atomes et Molécules, Université de Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
Eric AdriaenssensUniv. Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Centre Oscar Lambret, UMR9020-UMR-S 1277-Canther-Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, Université de Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
Robert-Alain ToillonUniv. Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Centre Oscar Lambret, UMR9020-UMR-S 1277-Canther-Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, Université de Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
Xuefen Le BourhisUniv. Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Centre Oscar Lambret, UMR9020-UMR-S 1277-Canther-Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, Université de Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
Benjamin PfeutyUniv. Lille, CNRS, UMR 8523-PhLAM-Physique des Lasers Atomes et Molécules, Université de Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
Chann LagadecUniv. Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Centre Oscar Lambret, UMR9020-UMR-S 1277-Canther-Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, Université de Lille, 59000, Lille, France. chann.lagadec@inserm.fr.
François AnquezUniv. Lille, CNRS, UMR 8523-PhLAM-Physique des Lasers Atomes et Molécules, Université de Lille, 59000, Lille, France. francois.anquez@univ-lille.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2071-5527

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-11-LABX-0007Institut Nationale du Cancer ARC_INCa_LNCC_8068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhenotypic plasticity is a major factor in tumor heterogeneity and treatment resistance. In particular, cancer stem cells (CSCs) represent a small subpopulation within tumors that possesses self-renewal and tumor-forming capabilities. Understanding reprogramming, maintenance, and lineage properties of CSCs requires dedicated tools to disentangle the respective influences of phenotypic inheritance and cell-cell interactions.

methodsHere, we set up ultra-wide field microscopy to image breast cancer cell lines expressing a stemness fluorescent reporter over several days. The fluorescent reporter distinguishes three phenotypes: CSCs, cancer differentiated cells (CDCs), and intermediate/transiting cancer cells (iCCs).

resultsSpatial statistics indicate significant zonation in which CSCs cluster together and are spatially separated from CDCs, forming patterns resembling niches. Surprisingly, single-cell time series reveal spontaneous reprogramming events from CDC to CSC even in unperturbed populations. We identify that such transitions are prone to arise during the cell cycle. Moreover, lineage analysis shows that the phenotype is partially inherited from ancestor cells. However, such heredity is not sufficient to explain the spatial properties of the cell population, which also depend on cell-cell interactions. Indeed, we find that phenotypic transitions of cancer cells are influenced by the phenotypic state of neighboring cells. Reprogramming into CSCs is respectively promoted and inhibited by the presence of CSCs and CDCs in the neighborhood.

conclusionsAltogether, our results disentangle how phenotypic inheritance and intercellular interactions orchestrate the spatio-temporal self-organization of cancer cell heterogeneity, maintaining a subpopulation of CSCs within niches.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeoplastic Stem CellsSingle-Cell AnalysisStem Cell NicheCell CommunicationCell DifferentiationCell Line, TumorFemaleHumansCancer stem cellsPlasticitySingle cell trackingTime-lapse microscopy

Identifiers

PMID41146294
PMCPMC12560515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.