ArticleStem cell research & therapy2025
Spatial self-organization of cancer stem cell niches revealed by live single-cell imaging.
Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiscale modeling of the spatial structure of stem cells in neuroblastoma patient-derived tumoroids reveals a critical role for a short-range diffusive process.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Multidimensional tumor heterogeneity and its role in therapeutic resistance.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPhenotypic plasticity is a major factor in tumor heterogeneity and treatment resistance. In particular, cancer stem cells (CSCs) represent a small subpopulation within tumors that possesses self-renewal and tumor-forming capabilities. Understanding reprogramming, maintenance, and lineage properties of CSCs requires dedicated tools to disentangle the respective influences of phenotypic inheritance and cell-cell interactions.
methodsHere, we set up ultra-wide field microscopy to image breast cancer cell lines expressing a stemness fluorescent reporter over several days. The fluorescent reporter distinguishes three phenotypes: CSCs, cancer differentiated cells (CDCs), and intermediate/transiting cancer cells (iCCs).
resultsSpatial statistics indicate significant zonation in which CSCs cluster together and are spatially separated from CDCs, forming patterns resembling niches. Surprisingly, single-cell time series reveal spontaneous reprogramming events from CDC to CSC even in unperturbed populations. We identify that such transitions are prone to arise during the cell cycle. Moreover, lineage analysis shows that the phenotype is partially inherited from ancestor cells. However, such heredity is not sufficient to explain the spatial properties of the cell population, which also depend on cell-cell interactions. Indeed, we find that phenotypic transitions of cancer cells are influenced by the phenotypic state of neighboring cells. Reprogramming into CSCs is respectively promoted and inhibited by the presence of CSCs and CDCs in the neighborhood.
conclusionsAltogether, our results disentangle how phenotypic inheritance and intercellular interactions orchestrate the spatio-temporal self-organization of cancer cell heterogeneity, maintaining a subpopulation of CSCs within niches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.