ArticleEnvironmental health : a global access science source2025
Occupational exposure to formaldehyde and risk of lymphoma subtypes: results of a multicentre Italian case-control study.
Article in Environmental health : a global access science source, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sinonasal hemangiosarcoma following juvenile occupational exposure to formaldehyde when breeding farm animals.Annals of occupational and environmental medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe International Agency for Research on Cancer classifies formaldehyde as a human carcinogen, with sufficient evidence for nasopharyngeal cancer and leukaemia. However, the association with lymphoma subtypes has been less thoroughly investigated. We explored this link in an Italian multicentre case-control study.
methodsA total of 867 incident lymphoma cases, histologically confirmed using the WHO classification, and 774 controls participated in the study. Occupational experts classified the probability, frequency, and intensity of exposure to formaldehyde for each study subject based on detailed questionnaire data and literature information. We used unconditional regression analysis to model the risk of lymphoma and its main subgroups and subtypes associated with different formaldehyde exposure metrics, adjusting for age, gender, education, and study centre.
resultsEver exposure to formaldehyde was not associated with risk of all lymphomas combined, the non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and B-cell lymphoma (BCL) subgroups, or the most prevalent BCL subtypes, but multiple myeloma (MM) (OR = 2.0, 95% CI 1.19–3.31). MM risk also showed consistent upward trends with all the exposure metrics (p for trend ranging 0.005–0.034). Hodgkin’s lymphoma risk was also elevated in the top categories of intensity, duration, and cumulative exposure, but no significant increasing trends were observed.
conclusionsOur findings suggest an increased risk of multiple myeloma associated with occupational exposure to formaldehyde. A stronger link was observed for daily exposure lasting 20 years or more. The risk of Hodgkin’s lymphoma was also elevated at high exposure intensities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.