Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41146277›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2025

Predicting COVID-19 patient recovery or mortality using deep neural decision tree and forest.

Mohammad Dehghani, Mohadeseh Zarei Ghobadi, Mobin Mohammadi, Diyana Tehrany Dehkordy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohammad DehghaniSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. dehghani.mohammad@ut.ac.ir.
Mohadeseh Zarei GhobadiIndependent Reseacher, Tehran, Iran.
Mobin MohammadiIsfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Diyana Tehrany DehkordyDepartment of Medical Informatics, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIdentifying patients at high risk of mortality is crucial for emergency physicians to allocate hospital resources effectively, particularly in regions with limited medical services. This need becomes even more pressing during global health crises that lead to significant morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of deep neural decision forests and deep neural decision trees in predicting mortality among COVID-19 patients. To achieve this, we utilized patient data encompassing COVID-19 diagnosis, demographics, health indicators, and occupational risk factors to analyze disease severity and outcomes. The dataset was partitioned using a stratified sampling method. Nine machine learning and deep learning methods were employed to build predictive models.

resultsAmong the models, the deep neural decision forest outperformed others. Results indicated that using only clinical data yielded an accuracy of 80.7%, recall of 80.7%, precision of 75.7%, and F1-score of 74.8% by deep neural decision forest, demonstrating it as a reliable predictor of patient mortality. The model differs from other machine learning approaches for COVID-19 mortality prediction by combining the representational power of deep neural networks with the structured decision-making of decision forests, enhancing interpretability and performance using only clinical data without reliance on imaging or laboratory tests.

Indexed as

COVID-19Decision TreesDeep LearningFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerPrognosisRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2Deep learningDeep neural decision forestHealthcareMachine learningMortality prediction

Identifiers

PMID41146277
PMCPMC12560580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.