ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2025
Effects of kinesio tape on countermovement jump kinetic variables in physically active females with flat feet before and after fatigue: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFlatfoot, characterized by a reduced medial longitudinal arch, alters lower-limb biomechanics and affects vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) during dynamic tasks like jumping. Kinesio taping (KT) is often used to support foot posture; however, its efficacy under high-load conditions-such as jumping, which increases arch stress, and fatigue, which reduces muscular support-remains unclear.
methodsThis double-blind randomized controlled trial included 46 physically active females with flexible flat feet (arch height ratio < 0.221), assigned to KT or sham groups. Participants performed countermovement jumps (CMJs) under fresh and fatigued conditions, with and without taping. Fatigue was induced via lateral hopping, and KT was applied to the foot arches and tibialis posterior. vGRF variables were assessed across all conditions and categorized into three functional domains: propulsion (eccentric and concentric peak force and power, amortization time and force, concentric rate of force development, and eccentric stiffness); flight (jump height and reactive strength index); and landing (landing stiffness and rate of force development). Navicular drop was also measured only under pre-fatigue conditions.
resultsSignificant main effects of group, taping condition, and their interaction were observed for navicular drop, all with large effect sizes. KT reduced arch collapse by 17.8%, compared to 0.9% in the sham group. No significant effects of group or taping were found for vGRF variables. In contrast, fatigue significantly reduced jump height and increased force- and stiffness-related metrics across both groups (Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted p < 0.05), all with large effect sizes.
conclusionsKT applied to the foot arches and tibialis posterior had no effect on dynamic performance, and the static improvement did not reach clinical significance. In contrast, fatigue significantly reduced jump height and increased force- and stiffness-related parameters across both KT and sham groups, likely reflecting compensatory neuromechanical strategies in individuals with flexible flat feet. No taping effect was observed during CMJs performed under both non-fatigued and fatigued conditions. These findings suggest that KT offers limited functional benefit during dynamic tasks in this population. Future studies should investigate alternative taping techniques or adjunctive interventions that more effectively support performance under high-load or fatigued states in individuals with flexible flat feet.
trial registrationhttps://irct.behdasht.gov.ir , IRCT20201128049511N4, registered on 11/28/2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.