ArticleJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2025
An interpretable machine learning tool for predicting perioperative cardiac events in patients scheduled for hip fracture surgery: insights from the multicenter LUSHIP study.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence for predicting perioperative anaesthetic complications and supporting clinical decision-making: a scoping review.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Review
- Comment on "an interpretable machine learning tool for predicting perioperative cardiac events in patients scheduled for hip fracture surgery: insights from the multicenter LUSHIP study".Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Article
- Underlying Mechanisms of Osteoporosis in the Context of Multimorbidity: Clinical Challenges and Management Strategies.Nutrients · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundElderly patients undergoing surgery for hip fractures are at high risk for perioperative Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE), which can markedly compromise postoperative outcomes. This study aims to develop a machine learning (ML) based, interpretable tool to predict MACE using clinical and ultrasound-based variables in this population.
methodsWe analyzed data from 877 patients in the multicenter LUSHIP study, incorporating demographics, Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI), functional status, and preoperative lung ultrasound (LUS) scores. Multiple ML models were trained and validated using bootstrap resampling. The final ensemble meta-model combined GBM (Gradient Boosting Machine) and GLMNET (Elastic-Net Regularized Generalized Linear Models).
resultsThe ensemble model achieved an AUROC of 0.86, with sensitivity and specificity of 0.72 and 0.83, respectively. These results significantly improve over traditional tools such as the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI), particularly when used alone. A significant contribution of this work is the integration of lung ultrasound (LUS) as a non-invasive, bedside biomarker, which notably improved risk prediction compared to the performance of the individual LUS marker alone (AUC = 0.78). Relevant predictors for the ML model are LUS score, RCRI score, and patient age. A web-based Shiny application was developed to enable real-time personalized risk estimation.
conclusionThis interpretable ML model improves perioperative cardiac risk stratification and profiling in elderly hip fracture patients and may guide targeted preventive strategies and resource allocation.
trial registrationCT04074876.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.