Trial reportJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025
Enhancing astronaut training: effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on manual rendezvous and docking skill acquisition.
Trial report in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundManned spaceflight missions are characterized by significant operational risks, low fault tolerance, and high complexity, necessitating astronauts to achieve exceptional proficiency through training. This study employed a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled design to investigate the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on astronauts' acquisition of manual rendezvous and docking (RVD) skills. Additionally, electroencephalography (EEG) was utilized to analyze tDCS-induced cortical modulations during manual RVD training.
methodsA total of 26 participants (tDCS group, n = 14; sham group, n = 12) completed the experiment. Each participant underwent eight blocks of manual RVD training, with EEG recordings throughout the training. A bilateral M1 montage (anode at C3, cathode at C4) was applied using 1.5 cm ring electrodes, with stimulation lasting 25 min over four training blocks. Learning outcomes for both groups were quantified using composite scores derived from endpoint accuracy parameters and performance metrics related to manual RVD training. Additionally, a skill retention test was administered three weeks after the completion of training.
resultsThe tDCS group demonstrated superior performance in skill acquisition compared to the sham group. Significant group × time interactions were observed in both RVD attitude accuracy (F = 2.606, p = 0.024, Cohen's d = 0.367) and composite performance scores (F = 2.506, p = 0.026, Cohen's d = 0.646), with the tDCS group exhibiting an average performance improvement of 11% over the sham group. Furthermore, retention tests administered three weeks post-training revealed significantly higher scores in the tDCS group (t = 2.874, p = 0.011, Cohen's d = 1.189). EEG analysis indicated distinct θ band activity patterns in the right M1 region between the two groups during training [F(1,50) = 5.910, p = 0.025, η² = 0.172], with the tDCS group showing characteristic neural modulation patterns that correlated with enhanced skill learning.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that bilateral M1 tDCS enhances manual RVD skill acquisition in astronaut training. This technique shows promise for application in astronaut training, potentially improving the efficiency and retention of skill training for space missions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.