ArticleBMC medical education2025
Exploring faculty development initiatives in medical education in resource-limited settings: perspectives and challenges.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Peer Teaching in Orthopedic Clinical Education: Historical Cohort Study.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Qualities of an effective teacher: a cross-cultural study on the perspectives of students and faculty in two medical programs in Cyprus and Sweden.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFaculty Development Programs (FDPs) are integral to institutional priorities to support staff members in leveraging the skills necessary to deliver quality education and enhance the overall learning experience. Little is known about their impact in resource-limited settings. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the perceptions of medical and health faculty members in Sudan toward FDPs by exploring their views on their performance, the learning environment, and the challenges hindering program implementation.
methodA descriptive, cross-sectional survey consisting of twenty-six items was used to collect data from faculty members to assess their perceptions of the FDPs.
resultThere was a 77% response rate (n = 103) to the survey from the targeted sample size of 134. Most of the staff members (90.3%, n = 93) perceive FDP activities as beneficial for enhancing their teaching abilities, while 70.9% (n = 73) see improvement in research practices, and 54.4% (n = 56) observe benefits to their clinical skills. Fewer respondents (46.6%, n = 48) reported improvements in their scientific publications. However, several challenges were identified, with time constraints perceived as a major obstacle to effective program implementation.
conclusionIn a resource-limited setting, evaluating the program's effectiveness plays a pivotal role in improving its activities. Providing additional resources, enhancing institutional support, and improving accessibility to activities can strengthen the program's success, ultimately benefiting both staff and students. These insights may offer valuable guidance for institutions facing similar constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.