SynthesisBMC health services research2025
Professional self-perception of hospital clinical pharmacists and its influencing factors: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe global demand for clinical pharmacy services has intensified due to aging populations, increasing polypharmacy, and healthcare workforce shortages. The professional self-perception of clinical pharmacists (CPs) critically impacts service quality, retention, and patient relationships, necessitating strategic career planning.
aimTo systematically evaluate hospital CPs' professional self-perception in different countries and regions and analyze its influencing factors, providing a reference for policy optimization in low- and middle-income countries.
methodsFrom two English databases and four Chinese databases, we searched for original studies on the perception of CPs regarding their profession until January 2025. Two researchers independently screened the literature and extracted the data, and the included studies were assessed for quality according to the Let Evidence Guide Every New Decision (LEGEND) evidence evaluation tools.
resultsA total of 18 studies (17 cross-sectional studies and one prospective study) spanning 1977-2023, covering the USA, China, Sweden, and Vietnam were included. In the USA, higher levels of satisfaction are reported among pharmacists who are engaged more in direct patient care; however, challenges such as insufficient recognition and limited career advancement still remain. In China, CPs generally exhibit positive professional self-perception, although gaps in competency, income dissatisfaction, and workload challenges persist. Swedish CPs demonstrated high professional acceptance, effective interdisciplinary collaboration, and confidence in expanding their prescribing responsibilities within healthcare teams. Vietnam highlighted stress from patient care responsibilities and income disparities. The key influencing factors that affect CP job satisfaction include intrinsic factors (e.g., clinical activity involvement, autonomy), extrinsic factors (e.g., training) and other factors (e.g., level of hospital, level of skills).
conclusionsCPs' professional self-perception exhibited notable regional differences. Given the qualitative nature of data and heterogeneity of study designs, the results still suggest that clinical activity involvement and autonomy consistently correlate with higher job satisfaction among CPs, whereas inadequate recognition, excessive workload, limited advancement opportunities and financial constraints hinder professional fulfillment. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Registered protocol at PROSPERO: CRD42024470413.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.