Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41146152›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Do free healthcare policies play a role in expanding national health insurance enrollment among informal sector workers? The case of the Afya Care pilot program in Kenya.

Phidelis N Wamalwa, Christoph Strupat, Edmund Yeboah, MaryBennah N Kuloba, Boniface Mbuthia, Manuela De Allegri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Phidelis N WamalwaMedical Faculty, Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 365, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany. Phidelis.wamalwa@uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7789-1292
Christoph StrupatGerman Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5545-3627
Edmund YeboahMedical Faculty, Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 365, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4976-3856
MaryBennah N KulobaMedical Faculty, Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 365, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0394-4619
Boniface MbuthiaAfrican Medical and Research Foundation, Kenya Head Office, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9029-7295
Manuela De AllegriMedical Faculty, Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 365, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8677-1337

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral Sub-Saharan African countries have transitioned from fiscally unsustainable free healthcare policies to national health insurance schemes. These national schemes often expect informal sector workers to contribute directly to the scheme. Although enrollment in the national scheme is critical to achieving universal health coverage, informal sector workers’ inclusion remains challenging. In this paper, using the case of the Afya-Care free healthcare policy pilot in Kenya, we examine an issue that has thus far received limited attention in the literature: the extent to which earlier exposure to free healthcare policies shapes later informal sector workers’ decisions to enrol and contribute to a public health insurance scheme.

methodsWe used nationally representative repeated cross-sectional household data collected among informal sector workers in Kenya in 2018 and 2020 before and after the Afya Care-free healthcare pilot, respectively. Using a sample of 6900 informal sector workers, we constructed a pre-and-post quasi-experimental design applying difference-in-differences estimation modelling to assess the effect of exposure to the Afya-Care free healthcare policy pilot on individuals' decisions to enrol later in the national health insurance scheme.

resultsNo Difference was observed between the two groups before intervention. However, after the intervention, our findings show a 10.5% difference in national health insurance scheme enrollment between the control and intervention groups (p < 0.001). Individuals in the intervention counties had a 65% greater probability of enrolling in the national health insurance scheme than did those in the control counties (odds ratio -1.65; p = 0.07; 95% CI—0.96- 2.83). Heterogeneity analysis revealed a significant increase in enrollment in the intervention group by 30% and 18% among the least educated and among the poorest individuals, respectively.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that exposure to the Afya Care-free healthcare policy favoured the decision to enrol in the national health insurance scheme and enhanced equity. However, registration in the scheme remains low. Increased enrollment is likely to follow only from an enhanced government commitment to improve information campaigns to boost awareness, to expand subsidies to increase premium affordability, especially among low-income informal sector workers, and to subsidise those who cannot afford to pay.

Indexed as

Health PolicyInformal SectorNational Health ProgramsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansKenyaMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsFree healthcare policiesHealth insuranceInformal sectorNational Health ProgramsUniversal health care

Identifiers

PMID41146152
PMCPMC12560322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.