Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41146140›Full record

ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2025

Biodiversity, sustainable utilization, and conservation of the wild plants used in Traditional Mongolian Medicine of the Greater Khingan Mountains.

Yi-Ru-Gui, Wenxiao Zhang, Xiongfei Ren, Liqing Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yi-Ru-GuiMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Ecology and Resource Use of the Mongolian Plateau & Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecology, School of Ecology and Environment, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010021, China.
Wenxiao ZhangMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Ecology and Resource Use of the Mongolian Plateau & Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecology, School of Ecology and Environment, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010021, China.
Xiongfei RenMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Ecology and Resource Use of the Mongolian Plateau & Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecology, School of Ecology and Environment, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010021, China.
Liqing ZhaoMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Ecology and Resource Use of the Mongolian Plateau & Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecology, School of Ecology and Environment, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010021, China. zhaotieniu@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Greater Khingan Mountains (GKM), located in the eastern Mongolian Plateau, are a multi-ethnic region predominantly inhabited by Mongolians, with the Han ethnic group forming the majority. The GKM serve as a vital plant germplasm resource and natural medicinal herb base in northern China. Through interactions with nature, Mongolians have developed distinctive traditional medicine cultures by discovering and utilizing wild plants for their healthcare, supported by oral traditions and practical knowledge accumulated over generations. This study comprehensively investigated the wild plants used in Traditional Mongolian Medicine (TMM) of the GKM, aiming primarily to: (1) promote the sustainable development and utilization of these plant resources by conducting an integrated assessment, and propose specific conservation strategies; (2) evaluate the commonalities and differences between TMM and local Mongolian Folk Medicine (MFM) applications, advance the protection and inheritance of traditional medicinal knowledge.

methodsFrom 2021 to 2023, multiple field investigations were conducted in the GKM to collect voucher specimens, which were integrated with the collation of previously collected specimens, taxonomic identifications, and also records of relevant literature, and the wild vascular plant species in this region were determined. On this basis, the inventory of the wild plants used in TMM of the GKM was established according to records in the Chinese Materia Medica: Mongolian Medicine Volume. By collating survey data from ethnobotanical studies in this region, the species and their utilization knowledge used by local Mongolians were obtained. The relevant information of the medicinal herbs that are industrially utilized by Mongolian Medicine pharmaceutical enterprises was obtained from their official websites. An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) model was applied to quantitatively assess the development and utilization value of these resources.

resultsA total of 163 wild plant species used in TMM belonging to 118 genera and 55 families, dominated by Asteraceae, were identified in the GKM. Among them, herbaceous plants (87.73%) are predominant based on life forms, and mesophytes (77.30%) constitute the majority based on water ecotypes. In terms of distribution area, the southern regions hosted the highest species diversity (161 species), while there are no significant differences between the northern (138), eastern (135), and western (131) regions. A total of 133 Mongolian Medicine names correspond to 163 scientific species names, with 27 borrowed names derived from Tibetan, Chinese, and Sanskrit. Whole plants (77 species) and roots and rhizomes (43) are the primary medicinal parts that are harvested mainly in autumn. Among the total wild plant species used in TMM, 92 (56.44%) are used by local Mongolian folk, 69 (42.33%) are used industrially, while 50 (30.67%) have been documented in the literature but lack practical application. Among the 92 species used by local Mongolian folk, the medicinal parts of 31 species are identical to those in TMM, and 36 species partially similar to those in TMM, and the 25 species are different from those in TMM. The medicinal parts and effects of 8 species are different from the records in TMM. This area has a clear focus on the cultivation of wild medicinal plants, concentrating on the ecological cultivation of geo-authentic herbs. Based on the integrated assessment values, the species were categorized into four grades: highest value (36 species), high value (28), general value (69), and low value (30).

conclusionThe wild plants used in TMM of the GKM stand out for their rich plant diversity, widespread distribution area, exceptional medicinal value, and unique geo-authenticity. Mongolian Medicine names reveal multicultural integrations of the TMM. The comparison between TMM and local MFM not only confirms that traditional knowledge of MFM and TMM belongs to the same medical system, but also reveals valuable indigenous knowledge that unrecorded in the TMM. Locally and industrially used wild plants used in TMM demonstrate high utilization rates, reflecting their high medicinal value. Special attention should be given to underutilized species, particularly those documented in the literature but lacking practical application, to advance their large-scale utilization while ensuring effective conservation. Conservation strategies require the integration of strengthened legal regulations, public education and science popularization, nature reserve management, species-specific conservation initiatives, large-scale cultivation, and rational harvesting practices to achieve effective conservation and sustainable utilization of these invaluable resources.

Indexed as

BiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesMedicine, Mongolian TraditionalPlants, MedicinalChinaEthnobotanyHumansMongoliaConservationGreater Khingan MountainsIntegrated assessmentSustainable utilizationTraditional Mongolian MedicineWild plants

Identifiers

PMID41146140
PMCPMC12557954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.