ArticleReproductive health2025
Protocol for a prospective cohort study on pre-eclampsia risk prediction in Ghana, Kenya and South Africa.
Article in Reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- PRESHA - Preventing severe hypertensive adverse events in pregnancy and childbirth: a study protocol for establishing a prospective cohort study and biobank in urban Tanzania.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLow dose aspirin is recommended for the prevention of pre-eclampsia in high-risk women. As part of the formative work for the "Preventing pre-eclampsia: Evaluating AspiRin Low-dose regimens following risk Screening" (PEARLS) trial, we aim to validate and implement a pre-eclampsia risk-screening algorithm, based on a restricted-variable version of the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) algorithm. In the trial phase, we will compare different daily aspirin doses (75 mg vs. 150 mg) for pre-eclampsia prevention and postpartum bleeding in high-risk women. This study protocol outlines the validation cohort for a restricted variable FMF algorithm in participating facilities in Ghana, Kenya, and South Africa.
methodsThis multi-country, prognostic accuracy study using a prospective cohort will recruit 16,007 pregnant women at 51 health facilities across Kenya, Ghana and South Africa. The eligible population are pregnant women presenting for an antenatal visit from 11 weeks and 0 days to < 20 weeks' gestation. Eligible women will be screened using a 'restricted variable' approach with the FMF algorithm (i.e. history and mean arterial pressure only), to identify women at high risk of preterm pre-eclampsia. This is performed via an adapted version of the Tommy's Clinical Decision Tool. The primary objective is to estimate a preterm pre-eclampsia risk threshold that equates to a screen-positive rate of 10%. Secondary outcomes include estimation of the prognostic accuracy and predictive performance of the tool. DISCUSSION: The study will provide critical evidence on the prognostic accuracy and predictive performance of a pre-eclampsia risk screening algorithm in sub-Saharan African settings. This study will inform the design of the PEARLS trial, as well as provide vital evidence for implementation of systematic risk screening for pre-eclampsia in African women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.