ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Rising C-section use and the private maternal health care sector in Pakistan: evidence from the 2012-13 and 2017-18 Demographic and Health Surveys.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPakistan is part of a global escalation in cesarean section (C-section) rates, raising concerns that medically unnecessary procedures are being performed-particularly within the private maternal health care sector. Some studies have shown that C-section rates are higher in private than in public health facilities, possibly due to timesaving and profit-driven incentives among private-sector physicians. Consequently, Pakistan's private health facilities may be more likely to perform nonessential C-sections than its public facilities. Building on these concerns, this paper examines how delivery at a private versus public facility in Pakistan affects the likelihood of a C-section, and how this likelihood has evolved over time.
methodsWe used data from the 2012-13 and 2017-18 Pakistan Demographic and Health Surveys. Unlike previous studies, we employed a conceptual framework to identify predictors and used a Heckman probit model to adjust for selection bias-recognizing that access to facilities offering C-sections varies across sociodemographic groups. The model conceptualized childbirth as a two-step process: determining, first, the place of delivery (home versus facility), and second, the mode of delivery (vaginal versus C-section).
resultsAccounting for selection bias and controlling for medical factors, women who delivered at private facilities were more likely to have a C-section. This likelihood increased from 3.6 to 14.2%-points between surveys. The larger gap in 2017-18 reflected an increase in the probability of a C-section in private facilities and a decrease in the probability of one in public facilities.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that C-sections are increasingly performed for nonmedical reasons, especially in private facilities where financial incentives and weak regulation may influence decisions. Considering community misconceptions and varied attitudes toward childbirth, culturally sensitive public education is needed. Targeted workshops and media campaigns can provide women and families with clear information on the risks and long-term consequences of unnecessary C-sections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.