Observational studyBMC neurology2025
Influence of geographical accessibility to specialist and primary care givers on excess mortality of multiple sclerosis patients in France.
Observational study in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccess to healthcare and socioeconomic deprivation are intricately linked. No studies have been led to measure the effect of healthcare accessibility on mortality in patients with MS so far. The objective was to examine the influence of travel time to the expert MS centre and of the accessibility to primary healthcare services on excess mortality in MS.
methodsA retrospective observational cohort study recruited patients from 18 French MS expert centres, with an onset of MS between 1960 and 2015 and a follow-up of up to 30 years. Primary health facility accessibility was measured by the Spatial aCcessibility multiscAlar index. Specialist care accessibility was measured by road travel time to the expert MS centre. Excess death rates (EDR) and excess hazard ratios were studied using additive excess hazard models with multidimensional penalised splines.
resultsThe study included 33,697 patients. Patients with relapsing-onset MS (R-MS) with a travel time of 40 min had the lowest EDR (Men: 1.2 deaths per 100 person-years (95%CI [0.8;1.8]), women: 0.8 deaths per 100 person-years 95%CI[0.6;1.2]), lower than patients who lived further from the centre. No effect of primary care access was found for patients with R-MS, and no effect of accessibility to primary or specialised care was found for patients with primary progressive MS.
conclusionThis study reveals the impact of travel time to neurologists on excess mortality in patients with R-MS in France. This distance bias association highlights the importance of preventing a potential selection of patients followed in MS expert centres.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.