ArticleBMC nephrology2025
A prescription-based model for predicting post-hemodialysis urea and electrolytes: a real-world validation study in acute hemodialysis.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUrgent-start hemodialysis often involves severe biochemical abnormalities but is associated with a high risk of complications. Currently, no tool has been validated to predict post-hemodialysis urea and electrolytes in acute settings from prescription data alone.
methodsIn this ambispective, two-phase study, we developed and validated a model to predict post-hemodialysis blood urea nitrogen and electrolytes using only prescription parameters in patients with urgent hemodialysis indications and those at risk for dialysis disequilibrium syndrome, severe hyponatremia, or hyperkalemia. The model was validated through statistical assessment of correlation and agreement. The model was integrated into a free, user-friendly web application (Adequator app®).
resultsThe development cohort included 303 treatments in 42 chronic hemodialysis patients. Dialyzer clearance, which was calculated via formal urea kinetic modeling, demonstrated excellent correlation and agreement with the proposed model (r = 0.99; 95% CI: 0.99 to 0.99) and a bias of 0.23 ± 1.2 ml/min (95% CI: -2.17 to 2.63). The validation cohort included 44 urgent hemodialysis sessions in 30 patients with chronic kidney disease or acute kidney injury and severe electrolyte abnormalities or at risk of dialysis disequilibrium syndrome. The predicted post-hemodialysis, blood urea nitrogen, sodium, and potassium levels strongly correlated with the measured values: r = 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93 to 0.98), r = 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94 to 0.98), and r = 0.84 (95% CI: 0.73 to 0.91), respectively. Agreement was also high, with biases of 0.4 ± 9.4 mg/dL (95% CI: -19.0 to 18.1) for blood urea nitrogen, -0.6 ± 1.6 mEq/L (95% CI: -3.8 to 2.5) for sodium, and 0.17 ± 0.4 mEq/L (95% CI: 0.6 to 0.9) for potassium. Among patients at risk of dialysis disequilibrium syndrome, 92% achieved the target blood urea nitrogen reduction ( < 40%) without severe neurological events. The sodium correction remained below 6 mEq/L, and potassium normalized in all the cases.
conclusionsA prescription-based model can reliably predict post-Hemodialysis urea and electrolyte values in urgent dialysis settings. The Adequator App HD-Predictor ( https://adequatorapp.com/hd-predictor ) offers a non-invasive, accessible tool to guide individualized prescriptions, enhancing safety and precision in high-risk clinical scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.