ArticleBMC genomics2025
Genome-wide identification, expression analysis of taars (trace amine-associated receptors) and response to cadaverine and putrescine in Mandarin fish (Siniperca chuatsi).
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe unique feeding behavior of Siniperca chuatsi (S. chuatsi), which exclusively consumes live fry and rejects dead fry, severely limits the development of its aquaculture industry. This rejection of dead fry likely stems from an aversion to necromones (death-associated odors). Although a subset of trace amine-associated receptors (TAARs) containing key conserved residues (Asp
resultsIn this study, we found that the aversion of S. chuatsi to dead prey is associated with necromones. Furthermore, we identified 68 taar family members in the S. chuatsi genome, distributed across six chromosomes, with 36 tandem duplication events generating 54 duplicated genes. Phylogenetic analysis classified taars into two classes, Class I and Class III, with a total of eight subfamilies. Synteny analysis revealed low synteny between the taars of S. chuatsi and Dicentrarchus labrax, with only 12 pairs of genes showing syntenic relationships. Protein sequence analysis demonstrated that taars contain amine recognition sites, N-glycosylation, and conserved cysteine structures, with high conservation and purifying selection observed within subfamilies. Subcellular localization revealed that TAARs are localized to the cell membrane and nucleus. Transcriptome data indicated that 61 taars are expressed in the olfactory epithelium, while only 19 are expressed in the brain. The response of representative taars to putrescine and cadaverine was divergent when comparing olfactory and brain tissues.
conclusionsThis study systematically identified the taar gene family in S. chuatsi, analyzing their evolutionary relationships, protein structures, subcellular localization, expression profiles in olfactory and brain tissues, and the response of selected TAARs to necromones (cadaverine and putrescine). This work establishes a foundation for further investigation into TAAR-mediated death odor recognition in S. chuatsi.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.