Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41146000›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025

Impact of PG-SGA-assessed malnutrition stratification on clinical outcomes in advanced gastrointestinal malignancies: a retrospective cohort study.

Pei Zhuang, Jun-Xuan Chen, Bing Xia, Xiao-Su Chen, Xiao-Tian Chen, Li Li, Ting Zhu, Shu-An Wang, Qing-Yan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pei Zhuang *Clinical Nutrition Department, The Second Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, 314000, China.
Jun-Xuan Chen *School of Public Health, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, 221004, China.
Bing Xia *Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine and Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210009, China.
Xiao-Su ChenClinical Nutrition Department, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210008, China.
Xiao-Tian ChenSchool of Public Health, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, 221004, China.
Li LiThe Comprehensive Cancer Centre of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School & Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210008, China.
Ting Zhu *Clinical Nutrition Department, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210008, China. zhutingls@163.com.
Shu-An Wang *Clinical Nutrition Department, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210008, China. glyywsa@163.com.
Qing-Yan Li *Clinical Nutrition Department, The Second Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, 314000, China. 1040953519@qq.com.

Funding

Aid project of Jiangsu Ningai Medical Development & Medical Aid Foundation NDYGN2024026Clinical Trials from the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University 2022-LCYJ-ZX-09Science and Technology Bureau of Jiaxing city, Zhejiang, China 2023AD31040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe traditional TNM staging system fails to explain survival heterogeneity in advanced gastrointestinal cancer, while malnutrition remains an underutilized prognostic modulator. We aimed to establish the prognostic value of dynamic nutritional risk stratification using the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA).

methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, 102 patients with AJCC 8th edition stage II-IV gastrointestinal malignancies underwent serial PG-SGA assessments at admission and 3-month follow-up. Nutritional risk was stratified as low-risk (PG-SGA 3-8) or high-risk (PG-SGA ≥ 9). Associations with overall survival (OS) were analyzed via Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression.

resultsAmong 102 advanced gastrointestinal malignancies patients, 68.63% (70/102) were high-risk nutritional group at admission versus 31.37% low-risk, with lower BMI in high-risk group (19.13 vs. 21.52 kg/m², P < 0.001) but comparable inflammatory/nutritional markers (P > 0.05). By 3 months, high-risk prevalence rose to 77.45% (79/102), where low-risk patients showed superior weight (58.00 vs. 50.00 kg), BMI (20.55 vs. 18.92 kg/m²), HB (120.13 vs. 100.91 g/L), ALB (41.15 vs. 34.33 g/L), PNI (47.12 vs. 39.72), CRP (1.63 vs. 11.54 mg/L), and dietary intake (all P < 0.05). Survival analysis confirmed 5-fold higher 3-year mortality risk in high-risk group (HR = 5.00, 95% CI: 2.00-12.47; P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis identified TNM stage IV (HR = 3.78, 95% CI: 1.25-11.42; P = 0.018), persistent high nutritional risk (HR = 4.09, 95% CI: 1.38-12.14; P = 0.011), and elevated CRP (HR = 2.32, 95% CI: 1.14-4.73; P = 0.020) as independent death predictors.

conclusionLongitudinal PG-SGA monitoring identifies critical nutritional deterioration threshold of PG-SGA ≥ 9 at 3-month follow-up and enables early intervention. We advocate integrating dynamic nutritional risk assessment into clinical frameworks to shift from empirical to predictive management in gastrointestinal oncology.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal NeoplasmsMalnutritionNutrition AssessmentAgedBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNutritional StatusPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentClinical outcomesGastrointestinal malignanciesMalnutritionPG-SGA

Identifiers

PMID41146000
PMCPMC12560561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.