ArticleBMC primary care2025
Accelerating the translation of findings from the MoTrPAC study to benefit clinical care: a qualitative analysis.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Molecular Transducers of Physical Activity Consortium (MoTrPAC) is a large-scale research study aimed at elucidating the effects of exercise training on the molecular mechanisms underlying the health benefits of exercise and physical activity. To take a first step toward achieving a goal of rapid dissemination, a qualitative analysis among frontline clinicians was conducted to identify the perceived clinical relevance of exercise research, MoTrPAC discoveries, and optimal ways to disseminate these results to key stakeholders.
methodsA convenience sample of 12 clinicians in internal medicine, family medicine, and emergency medicine agreed to participate in one-on-one interviews. Interviews were conducted over the phone by a member of the Wake Forest Qualitative and Patient-Reported Outcomes (Q-PRO) Shared Resource. Transcripts were stored and coded in ATLAS.ti version 24 software. Two Q-PRO members developed code summaries, which were synthesized into themes and organized using principles of reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsClinicians (n = 12) were predominantly male (n = 7), non-Hispanic White (n = 5), located in California (n = 10), and practiced in a Primary Care/Family Medicine setting (n = 6). Clinicians reported underuse of exercise testing due to provider-level and patient-level barriers. While they valued exercise research, they emphasized the need for clear, practical takeaways and preferred direct dissemination strategies.
conclusionsThese interviews highlighted the variable nature of exercise research dissemination and implementation and are the first steps toward shaping the dissemination of valuable scientific discoveries from the MoTrPAC study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.