Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41145940›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026

Reappraisal of the Clinical Utility of Hi-Cut Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Widespread Distal Cholangiocarcinoma: A Less Invasive Alternative to Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy.

Ryosuke Umino, Minoru Esaki, Takahiro Mizui, Akinori Miyata, Satoshi Nara, Nobuyoshi Hiraoka

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ryosuke UminoDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Minoru EsakiDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. mesaki@ncc.go.jp.
Takahiro MizuiDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Akinori MiyataDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoshi NaraDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobuyoshi HiraokaDepartment of Molecular Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe efficacy of Hi-cut pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for widespread distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) remains unclear. This study re-evaluated the impact of Hi-cut PD on survival, recurrence, and short-term complications.

methodsThe study retrospectively enrolled patients who underwent curative-intent PD for DCC between 2005 and 2021. Hi-cut PD was defined as bile duct resection beyond the midpoint between the superior border of the pancreas and the hepatic duct confluence. Bile duct margin status was classified as group A (negative or carcinoma in situ by PD), group B (negative or carcinoma in situ by Hi-cut PD), or group C (residual invasive cancer by Hi-cut PD).

resultsThe study enrolled 104 patients: 52 (50.0%) in group A, 46 (44.2%) in group B, and 6 (5.8%) in group C. The 5-year overall survival rates in groups A and B were comparable (52.3% vs 52.5%; p = 0.793). The patients without lymph node metastasis had a significantly better 5-year overall survival in group B than in group C (70% vs 25%; p = 0.027). Local recurrence rates were similar between the groups, and major surgical complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥IIIa) were comparable between groups A and B (15.4% vs 21.7%; p = 0.418). Although multiple bile duct orifices were most frequent in group B, the incidence of biliary fistula increased significantly only when five or more orifices were reconstructed (40% vs 4% with one orifice; p = 0.003).

conclusionsHi-cut PD for widespread DCC yielded survival outcomes comparable with PD without increasing local recurrence or major short-term complication rates, supporting its feasibility and oncologic validity as a less invasive alternative to hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for select patients.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaHepatectomyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPancreaticoduodenectomyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMargins of ExcisionMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPrognosisDistal cholangiocarcinomaHepatopancreatoduodenectomyHi-cut PDHilar bile duct resectionPancreaticoduodenectomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.