ArticleBehavior research methods2025
Automated detection of mouth opening in newborn infants.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Detecting Young Children's Deception Using Facial Expression Analysis With High Dimensional Statistical Methods.Developmental science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automated behavioral measurement using machine learning is gaining ground in psychological research. Automated approaches have the potential to reduce the labor and time associated with manual behavioral coding, and to enhance measurement objectivity; yet their application in young infants remains limited. We asked whether automated measurement can accurately identify newborn mouth opening-a facial gesture involved in infants' communication and expression-in videos of 29 newborns (age range, 9-29 days, 55.2% female, 58.6% White, 51.7% Hispanic/Latino) during neonatal imitation testing. We employed a three-dimensional cascade regression computer vision algorithm to automatically track and register newborn faces. The facial landmark coordinates of each frame were input into a support vector machine (SVM) classifier, trained to recognize the presence and absence of mouth openings at the frame level as identified by expert human coders. The SVM classifier was trained using leave-one-infant-out cross-validation (training: N = 22 newborns, 95 videos, 354,468 frames), and the best classifier showed an average validation accuracy of 75%. The final SVM classifier was tested on different newborns from the training set (testing: N = 7 newborns, 29 videos, 118,615 frames) and demonstrated 76% overall accuracy in identifying mouth opening. An intraclass correlation coefficient of .81 among the SVM classifier and human experts indicated that the SVM classifier was, on a practical level, reliable with experts in quantifying newborns' total rates of mouth opening across videos. Results highlight the potential of automated measurement approaches for objectively identifying the presence and absence of mouth opening in newborn infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41145926What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.