SynthesisEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2026
Techniques and outcomes in prosthetic rehabilitation for patients with ectodermal dysplasia: a systematic review.
Synthesis in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEctodermal dysplasia (ED) presents significant dental and craniofacial challenges, particularly in prosthetic rehabilitation due to anodontia or oligodontia, underdeveloped alveolar ridges, and altered vertical dimensions. Although diverse treatment modalities have been described, no consensus exists on the most effective rehabilitation protocol.
aimTo systematically review the literature on prosthetic rehabilitation in patients with ED, encompassing removable dental prostheses, fixed dental prostheses, and implant-supported prostheses, and to evaluate outcomes in terms of survival, function, aesthetics, patient satisfaction, and complications. MATERIAL AND
methodsA comprehensive manual and electronic search of PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar (grey literature) was conducted. Clinical studies, case series, and case reports involving prosthetic rehabilitation in ED patients were included. Data extraction was performed independently, and risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I and the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist.
resultsTwenty-nine studies were included, comprising case reports, case series, and prospective and retrospective cohort studies. Treatment approaches varied widely, including removable dental prostheses, fixed dental prostheses, and implant-supported prostheses. Most studies emphasised early intervention, multidisciplinary planning, and periodic revision of prostheses during growth. Implant-supported prostheses showed favourable long-term outcomes in adolescent and adult patients. Risk of bias ranged from low to moderate across studies.
conclusionProsthetic rehabilitation in ED requires an individualised, multidisciplinary approach. While implant-supported prostheses demonstrate promising outcomes, early removable solutions remain essential in paediatric cases. Further prospective studies with standardised protocols are needed to guide evidence-based treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41145907What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.